primary_prod
PI: Richard Barber, Duke University
John Marra, Lamont Doherty Earth Observatory
Walker Smith, Virginia Institute of Marine Science
dataset: Primary Production, incubated in situ, 24 hours
technician: Michael Hiscock, Duke University
project/cruise: AESOPS/RR_KIWI09; APFZ Process Cruise 2
ship: R/V Roger Revelle
Methodology:
- Chapter 19 of the JGOFS protocols (1994) "Primary Production by 14C"
- Hiscock, M.R., Marra, J., Smith, W.O., Jr., Goericke, R., Measures,
C.I., Vink, S., Olson, R.J., Sosik, H.M., Barber, R.T., in press. Primary
Productivity and its Regulation in the Pacific Sector of the Southern
Ocean. Deep Sea Research II.
- Barber, Richard T. 1993. In Situ Primary Production Protocols.
U.S. JGOFS Equatorial Pacific Protocols, 1993, section 7.
- Smith, W. O., Jr., R. T. Barber, M. R. Hiscock and J. Marra (submitted)
The Seasonal Cycle of Phytoplankton Biomass and Primary Productivity
in the Ross Sea, Antarctica. Deep-Sea Research II.
- Barber, R. T., L. Borden, Z. Johnson, J. Marra, C. Knudsen, and C.C.Trees
(1997) Ground truthing modeled kpar and on deck primary productivity
incubations with in situ observations. SPIE 2963, 834-839.
- Barber, R. T. and F. P. Chavez (1991) Regulation of primary productivity
rate in the equatorial Pacific Ocean. Limnol. Oceanogr. 36, 1803-1815.
- Morel, A. (1988) Optical modelling of the upper ocean in relation to its
biogenous matter content (Case 1 waters).
Journal of Biophysical Research 93, 10749-10768.
Parameter Description Units
event event number, from event log
sta station number, from event log
cast cast number, from event log
cast_type TM = trace metal rosette
CTD = CTD rosette
bot Goflo or Niskin bottle number
depth_n nominal depth sampled by Goflo or Niskin meters
chl_a chlorophyll_a as measured by HPLC method mg Chl m-3
In cases where we had primary productivity
measurements but no HPLC values, the
fluorometric chlorophyll a values were
corrected to photosynthetically-active HPLC
chlorophyll a values according to a linear
regression analysis of pairs of HPLC and
fluorometric measurements made from the
same water bottles (m=0.401, b=-0.000913,
n=106, r2 = 0.69) (Hiscock et al., in press)
depth_in_situ depth where samples were incubated in situ meters
pp24 primary production, carbon assimilation (24 hours) mmol C m-3 d-1
pb24 carbon assimilation per unit chl_a (24 hours) mmol C mg Chl-1 d-1
depth_light_1 depth of 1% light level based on Morel optical model meters
Note: To eliminate individual, ship and cruise
dependent sources of variability in the estimation
of kpar and assignment of light depths, Andre Morel's
optical model is employed (Morel, 1988; Barber et.
al., 1997). The model estimates the profile of light
extinction based on a profile of extracted
fluorometrically-determined chlorophyll a
concentrations. The Morel light profile is helpful
in comparing on deck vs. in situ primary production
integrations.
pp24_int_1 primary production, carbon assimilation (24 hours) mmol C m-2 d-1
integrated from 0 meters to the depth of the 1%
light level based on Morel optical model (depth_1%)
Note: 1% light level productivity was interpolated
or extrapolated from the in situ productivity
profile.
depth_light_0d1 depth of 0.1% light level based on Morel optical model meters
pp24_int_0d1 primary production, carbon assimilation (24 hours) mmol C m-2 d-1
integrated from 0 meters to the depth of the 0.1%
light level based on Morel optical model (depth_0.1%)
Note: 1% and 0.1% light level productivity values
were interpolated or extrapolated from the in situ
productivity profile.
pp24_opt optimum primary production for profile, carbon mmol C m-3 d-1
assimilation (24hours)
pb24_opt optimum carbon assimilation per unit chl_a for profile mmol C mg Chl-1 d-1
(24 hours)