primary_prod

 PI:              Richard Barber,  Duke University     
                  John Marra, Lamont Doherty Earth Observatory
                  Walker Smith, Virginia Institute of Marine Science  
 dataset:         Primary Production, incubated in situ, 24 hours
 technician:      Michael Hiscock, Duke University
 project/cruise:  AESOPS/RR_KIWI09; APFZ Process Cruise 2
 ship:            R/V Roger Revelle
 
 Methodology: 
   - Chapter 19 of the JGOFS protocols (1994) "Primary Production by 14C"
   - Hiscock, M.R., Marra, J., Smith, W.O., Jr., Goericke, R., Measures, 
     C.I., Vink, S., Olson, R.J., Sosik, H.M., Barber, R.T., in press. Primary 
     Productivity and its Regulation in the Pacific Sector of the Southern
     Ocean. Deep Sea Research II.
   - Barber, Richard T. 1993. In Situ Primary Production Protocols.
     U.S. JGOFS Equatorial Pacific Protocols, 1993, section 7.
   - Smith, W. O., Jr., R. T. Barber, M. R. Hiscock and J. Marra (submitted)
     The Seasonal Cycle of Phytoplankton Biomass and Primary Productivity
     in the Ross Sea, Antarctica.   Deep-Sea Research II.
   - Barber, R. T., L. Borden, Z. Johnson, J. Marra, C. Knudsen, and C.C.Trees
     (1997) Ground truthing modeled kpar and on deck primary productivity
     incubations with in situ observations. SPIE 2963, 834-839.
   - Barber, R. T. and F. P. Chavez (1991) Regulation of primary productivity
     rate in the equatorial Pacific Ocean.  Limnol. Oceanogr. 36, 1803-1815.
   - Morel, A. (1988) Optical modelling of the upper ocean in relation to its
     biogenous matter content (Case 1 waters).  
     Journal of Biophysical Research 93, 10749-10768.


 Parameter        Description                                              Units

event event number, from event log sta station number, from event log cast cast number, from event log cast_type TM = trace metal rosette CTD = CTD rosette bot Goflo or Niskin bottle number depth_n nominal depth sampled by Goflo or Niskin meters chl_a chlorophyll_a as measured by HPLC method mg Chl m-3 In cases where we had primary productivity measurements but no HPLC values, the fluorometric chlorophyll a values were corrected to photosynthetically-active HPLC chlorophyll a values according to a linear regression analysis of pairs of HPLC and fluorometric measurements made from the same water bottles (m=0.401, b=-0.000913, n=106, r2 = 0.69) (Hiscock et al., in press) depth_in_situ depth where samples were incubated in situ meters pp24 primary production, carbon assimilation (24 hours) mmol C m-3 d-1 pb24 carbon assimilation per unit chl_a (24 hours) mmol C mg Chl-1 d-1 depth_light_1 depth of 1% light level based on Morel optical model meters Note: To eliminate individual, ship and cruise dependent sources of variability in the estimation of kpar and assignment of light depths, Andre Morel's optical model is employed (Morel, 1988; Barber et. al., 1997). The model estimates the profile of light extinction based on a profile of extracted fluorometrically-determined chlorophyll a concentrations. The Morel light profile is helpful in comparing on deck vs. in situ primary production integrations. pp24_int_1 primary production, carbon assimilation (24 hours) mmol C m-2 d-1 integrated from 0 meters to the depth of the 1% light level based on Morel optical model (depth_1%) Note: 1% light level productivity was interpolated or extrapolated from the in situ productivity profile. depth_light_0d1 depth of 0.1% light level based on Morel optical model meters pp24_int_0d1 primary production, carbon assimilation (24 hours) mmol C m-2 d-1 integrated from 0 meters to the depth of the 0.1% light level based on Morel optical model (depth_0.1%) Note: 1% and 0.1% light level productivity values were interpolated or extrapolated from the in situ productivity profile. pp24_opt optimum primary production for profile, carbon mmol C m-3 d-1 assimilation (24hours) pb24_opt optimum carbon assimilation per unit chl_a for profile mmol C mg Chl-1 d-1 (24 hours)