Is U.S. JGOFS/SMP Remotely Sensible?
Dave Siegel
University of California, Santa Barbara

Advances since SMP started...
Full suite of satellite sensors are in orbit
Ocean color
Altimetry (sea level, eddies, dynamics)
SST (air-sea exchanges)
Scatterometry (wind stress)
Passive & active radar (sea ice, SST, precip)
Data are freely available (but difficult to use)
Get forcing & some BGC response (just not all)

Useful ocean color products?
Chlorophyll (SeaWiFS is within spec of 35% rms)
Primary production (via bio-optical models)
POC (via backscatter relationships)
CDOM (with links to photochemical cycling)
Indices for phytoplankton community structure
Solar fluxes into & within water column
Heterotrophy???

SeaWiFS Chlorophyll

Primary Production Distributions

POC

Chromophoric DOM

E. huxleyi Blooms

Indices of Heterotrophy??

Estimates of Respiration??

What’s Missing?
Difficult determinations
pCO2 & NO3 have some hope via regression analyses
DIC, DOC, f-ratio, BSi & export are less hopeful
Aerosols obfuscate analyses of mineral dust loading
Data assimilation
Enables satellite data to direct model solutions
Issues with using Chlorophyll (C/Chl, N/Chl ratio, etc.)
Other products (POC, CDOM, etc.) are not used in models

Summary
Satellite data sets are finally ready for prime time
Forcing & system responses can be diagnosed enabling bio-physical couplings to be assessed
Frontal and eddy interactions
Convective mixing and spring bloom events
Tropical and coastal dynamics
However, many important BGC system responses remain beyond our reach

Future Prospectus
These new data streams enable new & novel questions to be addressed
We are [almost] beyond the cal/val & algorithm development stages
New era of biogeochemical oceanography is approaching… hypothesis based science??