‹header›
‹date/time›
Click to edit Master text styles
Second level
Third level
Fourth level
Fifth level
‹footer›
‹#›
This is a map of the station locations from the global survey which have carbon measurements. The red stations indicate measurements collected as part of the US WOCE one time survey. The yellow stations were a part of NOAA’s OACES program. We have also made an effort to incorporate as much international data as possible. The blue stations in the Indian Ocean are from the French. Pacific data came from the Australians, Japanese, and Canadians. Much of the new Atlantic work was performed by the Europeans. The synthesis began in the Indian Ocean. These cruises had the best coordination are required the least effort to synthesize. We have just completed the Pacific synthesis and are now moving on to the Atlantic. All together we hope to have something on the order of 100,000 unique sample locations with at least two measured carbon parameters.
Subtracting the disequilibrium values from the delta C* values gives the anthropogenic CO2, which has a distribution like this. This is the column integral of anthropogenic CO2 in the Pacific. We can see that the largest inventories are found in the south Pacific associated with the Subtropical Convergence. A minimum in inventory is found in the tropical waters and the north Pacific maximum is shifted more towards the west. Note also that in general the high latitude Southern Ocean has low values, except off the Adelie Coast south of Australia which is a known bottom water formation area.
I didn’t really have a chance to get into this too much today, but an important aspect of our work is to use these results to evaluate the ocean carbon cycle GCM models. In general we have found that the models do a reasonable job of reproducing the large scale distributions, but there are a number of regional differences that likely are related to transport issues. For example, here we compare  the data based results with three different versions of the Princeton model. Each of the different versions have different transport and mixing schemes. Jorge will likely talk more about this, but my point here is simply to point out that the carbon data from the global survey can provide a strong constraint for diagnosing the transport in the carbon cycle models.