Group Leaders: Ed Laws and Ray Najjar
Objective: The goal of the biogeochemical modeling effort is to develop a model of carbon cycling in the ocean that simulates relevant characteristics of pelagic food webs and organic matter decomposition. Those characteristics should be incorporated into a global circulation model (GCM) that simulates the movement of carbon within the ocean and the exchange of CO2 between the ocean and atmosphere.
Background: Important aspects of the modeling effort will involve the identification of factors that limit photosynthetic rates at different times and places in the ocean and the relationship between the supply of those limiting factors and new and total production. Other aspects of the biological system that need to be simulated include: remineralization, diatom production, which is closely related to export production in many parts of the ocean, and the contribution of calcification to inorganiccarbon assimilation. An important constraint on the modeling effort is the need to develop a biological component that correctly simulates the important/relevant characteristics of carbon dynamics as influenced by biological processes without becoming so complex that incorporation into a GCM model becomes impractical.
Tasks: The proposed treatment of marine biogeochemistry in the Ocean Carbon Model Intercomparison Project (OCMIP) is relatively crude. The short-term task for this working group is to create a more robust set of parameterizations to include in the first round of OCMIP simulations for fall/winter 1998.
Membership:
Edward Laws
Ray Najjar
Ken Caldeira
Richard Barber
Robert DeConto
Group Leaders: Scott Doney, Ray Najjar, Ed Laws
Objectives:
Intermediate Biogeochemistry Model
The next obvious step for the Global Biogeochemistry working group is to develop, evaluate and study a more refined biogeochemical model beyond that used in the OCMIP-2 exercise but short of what might be considered a fully complete "ecosystem-bgc" model based on the ongoing synthesis of the JGOFS process and time-series data. A number of key issues such as remineralization lengthscales, CaCO3 and SiO2 cycles, sediments, and coupling with the physical circulation (e.g. the HBEI issue) need to be addressed in the current generation of modern global GCMS. Further, more detailed comparisons with the WOCE-JGOFS CO2 survey data and resulting diagnostic calculations (e.g. surface fluxes, meridional transports, Redfield ratios).
During it's second half day session, the working group began to define
the structure of such an "intermediate complexity biogeochemical model".
The plan is to have such a model ready on the time-scale of the next few
months so that experiments can be completed prior to next summer's workshop.
Important geochemical processes: | net community production
partitioning of production into POM vs. DOM export production subsurface transport, remineralization, and solubilization? CaCO3 production and dissolution SiO2 production and dissolution N2 fixation denitrification sediment remineralization micronutrient limitation nitrification (depending on tracers included) |
The current OCMIP-2 model contains some of these processes and the following set of prognostic variables: | DIC
total alkalinity dissolved oxygen PO4 dissolved organic matter (DOP?) [sinking particulate matter] (implicit with Martin et al. curve) |
An additional set of geochemical tracers may be needed: | NO3
SiO2 Fe |
... as well as more traditional "ecosystem" tracers: | phytoplankton (multiple size classes? allometrics?)
zooplankton (multiple size classes? allometrics?) bacteria suspended and/or sinking detritus DOM (P,N,C) ammonia ... |
Tasks:
The group decided on two immediate tasks:
In follow-up to the 1999 working group discussions, the issue of designing a biogeochemical model beyond that offered in the OCMIP exercise but short of what might be considered a fully complete "ecosystem-bgc" model based on the ongoing synthesis of the JGOFS process and time-series data. The list of both model considerations and needs is now better defined below
Model Considerations
2. Model Ouputs
3. Water column processes to be modeled
4. Observations to be compared with model output
Model Needs
2. Workshop: Iron and iron cyling