US JGOFS Antarctic Environments Southern Ocean Process Study (AESOPS)

Revelle Leg KIWI08, APFZ Process 2, 13 February - 19 March 1998

Documentation for: THE HYDROGRAPHIC BOTTLE DATA 

L.A. Codispoti (lou@ccpo.odu.edu)
Old Dominion University,  April, 1999

General Comments:

This "readme" file pertains to the salinity, dissolved oxygen,
and nutrient data taken from sampling bottles with the
hydrographic rosette that was equipped with 24 ~10-liter
"Niskin-like" Bullister bottles made mostly of PVC and equipped
with orange silicone o-rings during Revelle leg RR09 (13 February
- 19 March 1998).  Dr. Wilford Gardner of the Dep artment of
Oceanography at Texas A & M University  (wgardner@ocean.tamu.edu)
was the chief scientist during this leg.  This cruise was the
second process study leg on the R/V Roger Revelle during the U.S.
JGOFS program in the Southern Ocean (AESOPS).  The Revelle legs
focused on the Polar Front region and complemented several AESOPS
cruises on board the R/V Nathaniel Palmer that focused on the
Ross Sea.  Many casts with a trace metal clean rosette equipped
with 8, 30-l Go-Flo  bottles were also taken during this leg.
These data are not reported here because this system was not
designed to produce hydrographic data of "WOCE quality".  They
have been submitted in a companion report.  The user should also
be aware that  underway hydrographic data were also collected
during this leg, and these data are not included in this report.

Some questionable data are not included in this report. These
data are available upon request.

No units are given for salinity in this report because the most
recent definitions of salinity define it as a dimensionless
number.  To accommodate every preference, Winkler oxygen values
are reported in ml/l, micromolar and micromoles per kg.  The
latter values can only be calculated with a knowledge of the
oxygen sample temperatures when the samples were drawn.  These
"draw temperatures" are not reported here, but can be obtained by
contacting lou@ccpo.odu.edu.  Nutrient values are reported in
micromolar.  The nutrient values in micromolar can be converted 
to micromoles per kg,  by combining a temperature of 21 deg. C
and the  salinity of the sample to compute density and then
dividing the value in micromolar by this number. 

Methods:

In general, the methods employed for the bottle salinity, Winkler
dissolved oxygen, and nutrient analyses did not differ
significantly from those described in the JGOFS protocols that
were distributed in 1994 (UNESCO, IOC Manual and Guide #29). 
Minor differences included the following:  1) Sea-Bird CTD
systems and bottle carousels were employed (SBE-9+ underwater
units, SBE-11 deck units, SBE-32 carousels).  These units
represent a newer generation of equipment than the instruments
described in the JGOFS protocols.  2) The protocols give one a
choice of adjusting nutrient methods so that  calibration curves
are strictly linear, or opting for more response and taking into
account non-linearities.  We chose the latter method.  3) No
corrections were made for "carryover" between nutrient samples
run on the Technicon Autoanalyzer.  Carryover effects in our
nutrient analyses are generally less than ~2% of the
concentration difference between adjacent samples, and were
minimized by arranging samples in depth order, and by running
some samples in duplicate.   4) Calibration and re-calibration of
volumetric ware were not exactly as described in the JGOFS
protocols, but all volumetric flasks, maxipettors, and dosimats
were calibrated.  5) Duplicate oxygen samples were not routinely
drawn.  6) The JGOFS protocols do not describe an automated
technique for the analysis of ammonium concentrations.  We
employed the Berthelot reaction  using a method somewhat similar
to the method described by  Whitledge et al. (1981, Whitledge,
T.E., Malloy, S.C., Patton,  C.J. and Wirick, C.D. Automated
Nutrient Analyses in Seawater. Brookhaven National Laboratory
Rept.  BNL 51398, 216pp.).  

Temperature:

The temperature data associated with each bottle depth were taken
by the CTD system during the bottle tripping process.  Consult
the companion CTD data report for this cruise to learn more about
the CTD system. 

Sampling:

The samples in this report were taken from ~10 liter Bullister
bottles.  Because there is little or no lag time between
triggering a bottle and bottle closure with the Sea-Bird rosette
systems, our sampling protocols request that bottles be held at
the sampling depth for at least 30 seconds before tripping. 
NOTE THAT THE MID-POINT OF THE SAMPLING BOTTLES WAS ~1 METER
ABOVE THE CTD SENSORS.  THE DATA HAVE NOT BEEN CORRECTED FOR THIS
OFFSET. 

Salinity:

Salinities were determined with Guildline Autosal salinometer. 
New vials of  standard sea-water were used to standardize before
and at the end of every run.  Agreement between bottle salinities
and the sensors  on the Sea-Bird CTD systems was usually better
than 0.015 before post-cruise data processing which employs the
bottle salinities to correct the CTD salinities.  More
information on the quality of the salinity data are given in the
companion CTD report.

Dissolved oxygen:

The Winkler dissolved oxygen apparatus was built under the
direction of  Bob Williams (bob@odf.ucsd.edu) and supplied by the
Scripps Institution of Oceanography's (SIO) Ocean Data
Facility (ODF) group.  This system is computer controlled and
detects the end-point photometrically.  Temperatures of the
thiosulfate and standard solutions are automatically monitored by
this system.  

Nutrients:

Note that the terminology used to describe nutrients has become
somewhat loose over the years and that silicate = silicic acid,
dissolved silicon or reactive silicate, and phosphate = reactive
phosphorus.  Nutrient analyses were performed on a 5-channel
Technicon II AA system that was modified and provided by Doug
Masten (doug@odf.ucsd.edu) of the ODF group at the Scripps
Institution of Oceanography. 

Queries:

Questions about these data may be addressed to:

Dr. L. A. Codispoti
CCPO
Old Dominion University
Norfolk, VA 23529
lou@ccpo.odu.edu